😵‍💫 5 useEffect Dependency Myths That Cause Infinite Re-renders

“If your React app is re-rendering forever, chances are… your dependency array is lying to you.” 😅

We’ve all been there:
 You add a simple useEffect, refresh the page… and boom — infinite re-renders, API calls going brrr, laptop fan sounding like a jet engine. ✈️

Let’s break down 5 common myths about useEffect dependencies that silently cause performance issues and bugs — and how to fix them properly.

🚀 Crack FAANG Interviews in 90 Days!
Prep smarter, not longer. Real coding challenges, mock interviews, and expert guidance — all in one place.
🔥 Get Unlimited Access

❌ Myth 1: “Empty dependency array means it runs once forever”

useEffect(() => {
fetchData();
}, []);

🚨 Problem

This only runs once per component mount, not forever.
 If props/state used inside fetchData change later, your effect becomes stale.

✅ Better

useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);

📌 Rule:
 If you use a variable inside useEffect, it belongs in dependencies.


❌ Myth 2: “Functions don’t need to be added as dependencies”

useEffect(() => {
loadData();
}, []);

🚨 Problem

Functions are re-created on every render.
 React sees a new reference → effect can behave unpredictably.

✅ Fix with useCallback

const loadData = useCallback(() => {
console.log("Fetching...");
}, []);
useEffect(() => {
loadData();
}, [loadData]);

📌 Rule:
 Functions are dependencies too.


❌ Myth 3: “Objects and arrays are safe in dependency arrays”

useEffect(() => {
console.log(filters);
}, [filters]);

🚨 Problem

Even if filters content is same, its reference changes → infinite re-renders.

✅ Fix with memoization

const filters = useMemo(() => ({ status: "active" }), []);
useEffect(() => {
console.log(filters);
}, [filters]);

📌 Rule:
 Objects & arrays change reference easily → memoize them.


❌ Myth 4: “If it causes loops, just remove it from dependencies”

useEffect(() => {
setCount(count + 1);
}, []);

🚨 Problem

This creates stale state bugs.

✅ Correct approach

useEffect(() => {
setCount((prev) => prev + 1);
}, []);

📌 Rule:
 Never hide dependency bugs by deleting dependencies.


❌ Myth 5: “ESLint rules are optional warnings”

React’s ESLint rule:

react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

🚨 Problem

Ignoring this rule leads to:

  • Stale closures
  • Hidden bugs
  • Unexpected behavior in production

✅ Best practice

Fix the code, don’t silence the warning.

useEffect(() => {
fetchUser(userId);
}, [userId]);

🧠 Quick Mental Model


⚡ Real-World Infinite Loop Example

❌ Bad:

useEffect(() => {
setUser({ name: "Dev" });
}, [user]);

✅ Good:

useEffect(() => {
setUser((prev) => ({ ...prev, name: "Dev" }));
}, []);

🧩 TL;DR

  • useEffect re-runs when dependencies change
  • Functions & objects change references
  • ESLint warnings exist for a reason
  • Infinite loops = logic problem, not React problem

📌 Final Thought

Most infinite re-renders are not React bugs — 
 they’re dependency misunderstandings.

Once you master useEffect dependencies, your apps become:

  • Faster ⚡
  • Cleaner 🧹
  • Easier to debug 🧠

Writer : Akiko Kawai


— Bhuwan Chettri
Editor, CodeToDeploy

CodeToDeploy Is a Tech-Focused Publication Helping Students, Professionals, And Creators Stay Ahead with AI, Coding, Cloud, Digital Tools, And Career Growth Insights.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post